Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ricardo Silva's avatar

Climate scientists think it's a terrible idea: https://twitter.com/JKSteinberger/status/1638464093261529088?t=8FI1WVffXXTZOk_4SH1BUg&s=19

The ipcc report ranks carbon capture and storage as one of the worst options we have, both low potential impact and high investment cost: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/figures/summary-for-policymakers/figure-spm-7/

In the meantime, fossil fuel companies keep investing in it. So by publicizing it, you're helping them.

Robert J. Smith's avatar

This does not eliminate the problem, it just sweeps it underground and could give a false sense of security letting humans continue business as is. We don't really know what it will do the the "underground". Kind of reminds me when we used to dump trash in the sea because if we couldn't see it (on land in dumps) then it was a viable solution. Besides, what do the fans run on (i.e. what is the net CO2 impact)?

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?